Welcome our webmaster and SEO forum
Please enjoy the forum, contribute what you can, and wind up the Moderators!
Closed Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: W3 Validation - Is It a Waste of time??

  1. #1
    johnafrankllin's Avatar
    johnafrankllin is offline Senior Member johnafrankllin is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    205

    Default W3 Validation - Is It a Waste of time??

    Hi,
    It is really till now not clarified that the W3 validation that we do is really a waste of time or It gives some benefit to our site.
    Since in many cases I have seen some sites rock the web in terms of SERP and is not a valid HTML or XHTML Document.
    See the case of "web design" (without quote) keyword in google.com, here you will find the site at no 2 is not a valid HTML or XHTML Document but ranks well in SERP.
    In the same way you type "seo forum" (without quote) in google.com and you will find forums.seochat.com ranks no 1 with an invalid markup.
    So do we really not waste our time in doing validation, since by doing this we try to make our web page search engine friendly, and a site if rank well in major search engines means that it is SE friendly in whatever way the search engine spider looks at it.

  2. #2
    tb987's Avatar
    tb987 is offline Senior Member tb987 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    275

    Default

    The benefit is the knowledge that it will render properly in all users browsers. If you are just targetting IE and Firefox then you need not worry. From an SEO perspective it could be so bad that you are tripping up the browsers used by the search engine spiders - I think this is unlikely.

  3. #3
    smeagain is offline Distinguished Member smeagain is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    263

    Default

    You could take comfort in the fact that you can turn out shoddy work and in most cases it won't affect SEO or you could just do the job right.

  4. #4
    johnafrankllin's Avatar
    johnafrankllin is offline Senior Member johnafrankllin is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tb987 View Post
    The benefit is the knowledge that it will render properly in all users browsers. If you are just targetting IE and Firefox then you need not worry. From an SEO perspective it could be so bad that you are tripping up the browsers used by the search engine spiders - I think this is unlikely.
    Thanks for your opinion,

    But I don't think that the seochat would not be targeting the users who are using opera, safari, netscape etc. Why don't these big names bother about the validation?

    Regards
    John

  5. #5
    KingPin's Avatar
    KingPin is offline Super Moderator KingPin is a jewel in the rough KingPin is a jewel in the rough KingPin is a jewel in the rough
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Google.co.uk
    Posts
    473

    Default

    Validation is good for one thing only and that's for the users and their browsers.

    As for SEO, it makes no odds if the site validates or not.

    KP
    Organic SEO Blog (Updated Daily) - SEO.com

    Think Page Rank is Useful Or Pointless? Have your say on Page Rank here!!

  6. #6
    headdown is offline Junior Member headdown is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    14

    Default

    Got to agree with that. Getting a page validated does produce better code that could be easier to spider, but doesn't directly help the serps.

  7. #7
    Alan's Avatar
    Alan is offline Junior Member Alan is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Ayr, Scotland
    Posts
    13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by headdown View Post
    Got to agree with that. Getting a page validated does produce better code that could be easier to spider, but doesn't directly help the serps.
    Absolutely right. It's nothing to do with SERPs or PR come to that. Its a check that the code conforms to the accepted specifications.

  8. #8
    johnafrankllin's Avatar
    johnafrankllin is offline Senior Member johnafrankllin is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    205

    Default

    Thanks to all,
    You all may be right (or must be), then why the site like wikipedia believes in this and for whom it makes its all the pages error free?? Also it has not given any link on the page to show its visitor that the page is valid XHTML document.

    Regards
    John

  9. #9
    ohsuria is offline Junior Member ohsuria is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    29

    Default

    Interesting topic, I never analyze about this valid xhtml..
    until now I always try to make my site to be valid.

    if your html has one missing tag in the middle of your html.. but it still display correctly in firefox or ie.
    will spider only crawl your half top content..? as it thinks your half bottom page is wrong..?

    for example:

    Code:
    <html>
    
    <p>
    bla bla bla..
    </p>
    
    </div>
    will this content still be crawled?
    </div>
    
    </html>
    Please kindly advise and correct me if I'm wrong..
    Last edited by ohsuria; 06-20-2008 at 09:43 AM.

  10. #10
    johnafrankllin's Avatar
    johnafrankllin is offline Senior Member johnafrankllin is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    205

    Default

    The search engine spider will read it as
    <html>
    <p>
    bla bla bla..
    </p>
    will this content still be crawled?
    </html>
    It will ignore whatever it will not understand.
    Since it will not find starting tag for DIV so it will ignore the closing tag for it.

    Am I right?
    please suggest someone.

    regards
    John

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124